The Paradox of Control: Visual Clue vs. Auditory Instruction in Game Designing

Yusup Sigit Martyastiadi

Abstract


Visual clue and auditory instruction are information that used in games. the genuine information is developed on game design conceptualization. this paper explains the study of the paradox of control, which was applied in the process of game designing. Basically, the research investigates the differences of powerful game information between visual clue and auditory instruction to gain complexity of game levelling. the research method used game design experiments, playing observations, and the interview to clarify the respondents’ decision-making. the visual clues and auditory instructions were occurred randomly based on the path of the respondents’ chosen. However, in one level of observation, the information of visual clue & auditory instruction were happening together in the same time and those were contradictive each other. this condition was called the paradox of control on information handling in the game. interestingly, in this circumstance, most of the respondents decided to follow the visual clues, although it was not the right direction. that condition potentially led by visual perception. this paper will describe the respondents’ motivation on their decision-making. Finally, the result of this study could give recommendation for level designers in game designing, especially on complexity of the challenge in the game’s dramatic element.

Keywords


paradox of control, visual clues, auditory instruction, visual perception, players’ decision-making

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bates, Bob. 2004. Game Design. thomson course technology. 2

nd

Edition

csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly. 1990. Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience, new

York: Harper & Row Publishers, Inc.

Ferretti, Gabriele. 2017. Are Pictures Peculiar Objects of Perception?. Journal of the

american Philosophical association; cambridge Vol. 3, iss. 3

Fullerton, tracy. 2008. Game Design Workshop: A Playcentric Approach to Creating

Innovative Games. Elsevier. 2

nd

Edition

Gorini, A., Capideville, C.S., De Leo, G., Mantovani, F., & Riva, G. 2011. The Role

of Immersion and Narrative in Mediated Presence: The Virtual Hospital Experience.

cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social network. Vol. 14, no. 3, 99–105.

King, andrew J. 2009. Visual influences on auditory spatial learning. a review,

Philosophical transactions of the royal Society Biological Sciences

Meadows, M. S. 2003. Pause and Effect: The Art of Interactive Narrative. Pearson

Education. San Francisco

Minissale, Gregory. 2013. The Psychology of Contemporary Art. cambridge university

Press

O’leary, Ann & Rhodes, Gillian. 1984. Cross-Modal Effects On Visual and Auditory

Object Perception. Perception & Psychophysics. Volume 35, Issue 6, 565–569

Roettl, Johanna & Terlutter, Ralf. 2018. The same video game in 2D, 3D or virtual reality

– How does technology impact game evaluation and brand placements?. PloS one. Vol.

, iss. 7. San Francisco

Solso, robert l. 2003. The Psychology of Art and the Evolution of the Conscious Brain.

Mit Press/Bradford Books Series

tomaszewski, Zach. 2005. Foundations of Interactive Narrative. Retrieved from: http://

zach.tomaszewski.name/uh/ics699/intnarr.html

GaME oBJEctS:

unity3d. 2011. Island Demo Project. Downloaded from http://download.unity3d.

com/gallery/demos/demos/islanddemo.zip




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24821/ijcas.v5i2.2409

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 66 times
PDF - 48 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Visitors