Perubahan Esensi Ragam Hias “Sepak Bola” pada Batik Masa Kini

Michael HB Raditya

Abstract


The Essence’s Transformation of “Football” Decoration of Batik Today. Nowadays, batik has a massive development in its existance. In primary side, the existance more strong, but in other side batik had been changed. About Two years ago, Batik football decorative emerged and become a commodity by the batik artisans. The position of batik footbal decorative has become a dilemma. The issues made because there are many support and counter for that development. The issue about aesthetics and commoditization was creating by purpose of this change. Moreover, questioning the essence and existance of batik itself. In this article, batik football decorative will be discussed based on the essence and change. The dicussion about essence will be analyze with the aesthetic and commoditization perspective, while the changes would be discussed with the function and change itself. This thing did it to find the essence of batik football decorative. Conclusion of the research said the batik football decorative used a commoditization and decrease the aesthetic things to create the batik itself. The change occurs because there is a correlation between internal and external aspect on integrated of batik. The Analyze becomes a reflection to society, in batik for spesific, and arts in general view.

Keywords: Batik, Football, Transformation, Commoditization, Essence


Full Text:

PDF

References


- Buku

Anwar, Khoirul. 2012. Euforia Sepakbola, Studi Semiotika dalam iklan Piala Dunia History of Celebration. [Tesis]. Program Pascasarjana Sosiologi. Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Politik, Universitas Gadjah Mada.

Appadurai, Arjun. 1981. Gastro-Politics in Hindu South Asia. dalam American Ethnologist, 8 (3), 494–511

Bratasiswara, Harmanto. 2000. Bauwarna Adat Tatacara Jawa. Jakarta: Yayasan Suryasumirat.

Boskoff, Alvin. 1964. “Recent Theories of Social Change” dalam Warner J. Cahnman dan Alvin Boskoff, ed., Sociology and History. London: The Free Press of Glencoe.

Burke, J.P. 2009. Identity Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Eberhard, Wolfram. 1948. A History Of China. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul Ltd.

Eagleton, Terry. 1990. The Ideology of The Aesthetic. Cambridge: Basil Blackwell

Feldman, Edmun Burke. 1967. Art as image and idea. New Jersey: The University of Georgia Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliff.

Gustami, Sp. 2000. Studi Komparatif Gaya Seni Yogya, Solo. Yogyakarta: Yayasan Untuk Indonesia.

Hauskeller, Michael. 2015. Seni- Apa itu? Yogyakarta: Kanisius.

Haryono, Timbul. 2008. Seni Pertunjukan dan Seni Rupa dalam Perspektif Arkeologi Seni. Surakarta: ISI Press Solo

Hidayat, dan Widjanarko, 2008. Reinventing Indonesia: Menemukan Kembali Masa Depan Bangsa. Jakarta: Mizan

Honggopuro, Kalinggo. 2002. Bathik sebagai Busana dalam Tantangan dan Tuntutan. Surakarta: Yayasan Peduli Karaton Surakarta Hadiningrat.

Ismadi. 2010. Seni Kerajinan Batik Bayat Klaten Antara Tahun 1990-2010. [Tesis]. Program Pascasarjana Pengkajian Seni Pertunjukan dan Seni Rupa, Universitas Gadjah Mada.

Ismunandar, RM. 1985. Batik tradisional- Mancanegara. Semarang: Pahara Prize.

Kant, Immanuel, 1979. “Critique of the Aesthetical Judgment”, dalam W.E. Kennict, Art and Philosophy Reading in Aesthetics. New York: St. Martins Press.

Kapferer, Bruce dan Hobart, Angela. 2005. Aesthetic In Performance. New York: Berghagn Books

Kuntowijoyo. 2008. Penjelasan Sejarah. Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana.

Koentjaraningrat, 1994. Kebudayaan Jawa. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka

Krevitsky, Nia. 1964. The Art of Batik Today. Art Education, Vol. 17, No. 8 (Nov., 1964), pp. 33-35

Laksmi, V. Kristiani Putri. 2008. Bentuk Fungsi dan Makna Simbolis Motif Kain Batik Sidomukti Gaya Surakarta. [Tesis]. Program Pascasarjana Pengkajian Seni Pertunjukan dan Seni Rupa, Universitas Gadjah Mada.

Shadly, Hasan. 1990. Kamus Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.

Soemanto, Bakdi. 2008. “Sekapur Sirih” dalam Handoko, Anang. Sepak bola tanpa batas. Yogyakarta: Kanisius

Spreadley, James P. 2007. Metode Etnografi. Terj. Misbah Zulfa Elizabeth, Yogyakarta: PT. Tiara Wacana.

Sri Sultan Hamengku Buwana X. 1990. ‘Pengantar’ dalam Sekaring Jagad Ngayogyakarta Hadiningrat. Jakarta: Himpunan Pecinta Kain Batik dan Tenun Wastraprema

Stephenson, Nina.1993. The Past, Present, and Future of Javanese Batik: A Bibliographic Essay. Art Documentation: Journal of the Art Libraries Society of North America, Vol. 12,No. 3, pp. 107-113

Stratton, Garreth., Reilly, Thomas., etc. 2004. Youth Soccer: From Science to Performance. New York: Routledge

Sumardjo, Jakob. 2010. Estetika Paradoks. Bandung: Sunan Ambu Press

Suyanto, A.N. 2002. Sejarah Batik Yogyakarta. Yogyakarta: Rumah Penerbitan Merapi.

Syafrina, Fifin. 1996. Pemanfaatan Teknik dan Desain Batik dalam berbagai Media serta Pemanfaatannya. Jakarta: Fakultas Seni Rupa IKJ.

Raditya, Michael HB. Hibriditas Musik Dangdut dalam Masyarakat Urban. Dalam Journal ofUrban Society’s Arts vol 13 no. 1 April 2013 (1-14)

Rouffaer, G.P, dan H.H. Juynboll. 1914. De Batikkunst in Nederlandsch-Indie en Haar Geschiedenis. Jilid I-II. Utrecht: Oosthoek

Wibisono, Joss. 2012. Saling Silang Indonesia Eropa. Jakarta: Marjin Kiri.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24821/jocia.v1i1.1751

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.