Pemikiran Hanslick tentang Estetika dan Kritik Musik

Sunarto Sunarto

Abstract


Approaching the mid‐19th century began the aesthetics of music, especially Western music aesthetics as an independent science apart from philosophy. In the development of musical aesthetics are always closely related between philosophy and the philosopher. Discussion on the aesthetics of music can not be separated from some of the theories that have been developed by philosophers. Eduard Hanslick is a figure in the history of musical aesthetics of music included in ʺGroup Autonomisʺ. This group believes that music is a world of sounds organized and stand alone without any. For him and the group, the music is not the language of emotions or feelings. He then gave a sharp criticism against some composers include Richard Wagner and Anton Bruckner as a representative ʺGroup Heteronomisʺ who argue that music can be a means of expressing feelings, expressing ideas, or a certain atmosphere. According to the aesthetics of music is ʺabsoluteʺ (to the music itself). With absolutismenya, Hanslick criticized mercilessly composers heteronomis deems to have abused the music to be ʺprogramaʺ (music for something) ‐which he regarded as ʹcheap musicʹ. The rivalry between the two camps stream music aesthetics was known as The Great Debate.

Keywords


Aesthetics, Criticism, Autonomis, Heteronomis

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bowie, Andrew, “Music Aesthetics and Critical

Music”, J.P.E. Harper‐Scott and

Jim Samson (eds.), 2009, An Intoduction

to Music Studies, Cambridge:

Cambridge University Press, hal. 79‐

Sunarto, “Pemikiran Hanslick tentang Estetika

… “ 93

Budd, M., “The Repudiation of Emotion:

Hanslick on Music”, British Journal of

Aesthetics, xx, 1980, hal. 29–43.

Clapham, J., “Dvořák’s Relations with

Brahms and Hanslick”, MQ, lvii, 1971,

hal. 241‐254.

Deas, S., 1972, In Defence of Hanslick, London.

Dungga, J.A., 1995, Komposer‐komposer Perebut

Dunia, Jakarta: Puspaswara.

Grey, T., “Eduard Hanslick on Wagner’s,

Beethoven’, Wagner”, xv, 1994, hal.

‐57.

Grey, T., “Eduard Hanslick on Wagner’s “Actors

and Singers”’, Wagner, xix, 1998,

hal. 34‐40.

Hall, R.W., “On Hanslick’s Supposed Formalism

in Music”, Journal of

Aesthetics and Art Criticism, xxv,

‐1967, hal. 433‐436.

Hall, R.W., “Hanslick and Musical Expressiveness”,

Journal of Aesthetic

Education, xxix, 1995, hal. 85–92.

Hanslick, Eduard, 1891, The Beautiful in Music,

translated by Gustav Cohen,

London: Novello and Company Ltd.

Kivy, P., 1993, The Fine Art of Repetition: Essays

in the Philosophy of Music,

Cambridge: Cambridge University

Press.

Maus, F.E., “Hanslick’s Animism”, JM, x,

, hal. 273‐292.

McColl, S., 1997, Music Criticism in Vienna

–1897, Oxford: Oxford University

Press.

Payzant, G., “Hanslick, Heinse and the Moral

Effects of Music”, MR, xlix, 1988‐1989,

hal. 126‐133.

Payzant, G., “Hanslick on Music as Product

of Feeling”, JMR, ix (1989), hal. 133‐

Ridley, Aaron, 2004, The Philosophy of Music:

Theme and Variations, Edinburgh:

Edinburgh University Press.

Sams, E., “Eduard Hanslick, 1825‐1904: The

Perfect Anti‐Wagnerite”, MT, cxvi,

, hal. 867‐868.

Stock, Kathleen, 2007, Philosophers on Music:

Experience, Meaning, and Work,

Oxford: Oxford University Press.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24821/promusika.v3i2.1702

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times
PDF - 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 PROMUSIKA



P-ISSN: 2338-039X (print) | E-ISSN: 2477-538X (online)