Focus and Scope

CORAK is a scientific journal published by the Craft Department, Faculty of Fine Arts, Institut Seni Indonesia Yogyakarta, with number p-ISSN: 2301-6027 and e-ISSN number: 2685-4708.  ISSN - BRIN. This journal contains articles: (1) Research results in the field of craft art, (2) Conceptual ideas of the results of thought and creation in the field of craft art, (3) Book reviews in the field of craft art, (4) Results of community service in the field of craft art, (5) Interdisciplinary studies in the fields of philosophy, sociology, anthropology, and culture related to the field of craft art. The field of craft art includes textile, ceramic, wood, leather, and metal.

Section Policies

Articles

Open Submissions

Indexed

Peer Reviewed

Front Cover

Open Submissions

Indexed

Peer Reviewed

Peer Review Process

The submitted manuscript is first reviewed by the editors and must be free from plagiarism contents. The maximum limit of similarity is 20%. The submitted manuscript will be evaluated, whether it is suitable for our focus and scope or has a major methodological flaw.

At least two peer-reviewers will review every submitted paper. Reviewers are unaware of the authors' identity, and authors are also unaware of the identity of reviewers (double-blind review method). Reviewing process will consider novelty, objectivity, method, scientific impact, conclusion, and references. Reviewers' comments are then sent to the corresponding author for necessary actions and responses. The suggested decision will be evaluated in an editorial board meeting. Afterward, the editor will send the final decision to the corresponding author.

Publication Frequency

Corak: Jurnal Seni Kriya is published two times a year, in May and November.

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

Archiving

This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...

Publication Ethic

Section A: Publication and authorship 

1. All submitted papers are subject to a strict peer-review process by at least two international reviewers that are experts in the area of the particular paper.
2. Review process is blind peer review.
3. The factors that are taken into account in review are relevance, soundness, significance, originality, readability and language.
4. The possible decisions include acceptance, acceptance with revisions, or rejection.
5. If authors are encouraged to revise and resubmit a submission, there is no guarantee that the revised submission will be accepted.
6. Rejected articles will not be re-reviewed.
7. The paper acceptance is constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism.
8. No research can be included in more than one publication. 

Section B: Authors’ responsibilities

1. Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work.
2. Authors must certify that the manuscript has not previously been published elsewhere.
3. Authors must certify that the manuscript is not currently being considered for publication elsewhere. 
4. Authors must participate in the peer-review process. 
5. Authors are obliged to provide retractions or corrections of mistakes.
6. All Authors mentioned in the paper must have significantly contributed to the research.
7. Authors must state that all data in the paper are real and authentic.
8. Authors must notify the Editors of any conflicts of interest.
9. Authors must identify all sources used in the creation of their manuscript.
10. Authors must report any errors they discover in their published paper to the Editors. 

Section C: Reviewers’ responsibilities

1. Reviewers should keep all information regarding papers confidential and treat them as privileged information. 
2. Reviews should be conducted objectively, with no personal criticism of the author
3. Reviewers should express their views clearly with supporting arguments
4. Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors.
5. Reviewers should also call to the Editor in Chief’s attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.
6. Reviewers should not review manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers. 

Section D: Editors’ responsibilities

1. Editors have complete responsibility and authority to reject/accept an article.
2. Editors are responsible for the contents and overall quality of the publication.
3. Editors should always consider the needs of the authors and the readers when attempting to improve the publication.
4. Editors should guarantee the quality of the papers and the integrity of the academic record.
5. Editors should publish errata pages or make corrections when needed.
6. Editors should have a clear picture of research’s funding sources.
7. Editors should base their decisions solely one the papers’ importance, originality, clarity and relevance to publication’s scope.
8. Editors should not reverse their decisions nor overturn the ones of previous editors without serious reason. 
9. Editors should preserve the anonymity of reviewers. 
10. Editors should ensure that all research material they publish conforms to internationally accepted ethical guidelines.
11. Editors should only accept a paper when reasonably certain.
12. Editors should act if they suspect misconduct, whether a paper is published or unpublished, and make all reasonable attempts to persist in obtaining a resolution to the problem.
13. Editors should not reject papers based on suspicions, they should have proof of misconduct.
14. Editors should not allow any conflicts of interest between staff, authors, reviewers and board members.

Publication Reference

Every manuscript submitted to Corak : Jurnal Seni Kriya is required to use the APA Reference Style reference regulation system and mendeley reference.

http://linguistics.byu.edu/faculty/henrichsenl/APA/APA06.html

https://www.mendeley.com/

Abstracting and Indexing

Articles published in Corak : Jurnal Seni Kriya has been indexed in the following indexers:

1. Crosscef

2. One Search

3. Garuda

4. Sinta

5. Dimensions

Plagiarism Policy

Plagiarism Includes But is Not Limited to:

• Refer and/or quoting terms, words and/or sentences, data and/or information from a source without citing sources in the record citation and/or without stating the source adequately;
• Refer and/or quoting random terms, words and/or sentences, data and/or information from a source without citing a source in the record citation and/or without stating the source adequately;
• Using a source of ideas, opinions, views, or theory without stating the source adequately;
• Formulate the words and/or sentences themselves from the source of words and/or phrases, ideas, opinions, views, or theory without stating the source adequately;
• Submit a scientific paper produced and/or published by others as sources of scientific work without being express adequately.

Prevention

Corak : Jurnal Seni Kriya will ensure that every published article will not exceed 20% similarity score. Plagiarism screening will be conducted by Corak : Jurnal Seni Kriya using Turnitin.

Sanctions

• Reprimand;
• Letter of warning;
• Revocation of the article;
• Cancellation of publication.

ISSN 2301-6027 (print) | ISSN 2685-4708 (online).