Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

INVENSI: Jurnal Penciptaan Dan Pengkajian Seni contains all writings/articles with the object of art material, including performing arts, fine arts, and recording media art, which are multi-dimensional. INVENSI: Jurnal Penciptaan Dan Pengkajian Seni intends to provide a space to accommodate various kinds of ideas, ideas, or criticisms which are the results of quantitative and qualitative empirical research related to performing arts, visual arts, and recording media art that has never been published in any form.




Section Policies


Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed


Jurnal INVENSI memuat semua tulisan yang berobjek materi seni, baik seni pertunjukan, seni rupa, maupun seni media rekam dan bersifat multidimensional. INVENSI bermaksud untuk memberikan ruang mewadahi berbagai macam ide, gagasan, atau kritik yang merupakan hasil penelitian empiris kuantitatif dan kualitatif terkait dengan seni pertunjukan, seni rupa, dan seni media rekam yang belum pernah diterbitkan dalam bentuk apapun.

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Peer Review Process

All articles published in this journal will be double-blind reviewed by two or three experts who have specialized knowledge of the subject area and are often times researchers themselves with the aim of reaching an initial decision within a two-month time frame. Submissions that are out of the journal's scope will not be reviewed.
The peer reviewers check the manuscript for clarity and accuracy, assess the validity of the research methodology and theoretical base, and provide feedback to the editor.
The reviewers have specialized knowledge of the subject area and are often times researchers themselves. They review the article for quality of research. Their goals are to find gaps in reasoning and ensure that nothing has been overlooked. The article is returned to the editor with a recommendation to either reject the article, revise it, or accept it. The editor may send the reviewer’s comments to the authors, who may revise and resubmit the article for further review. If the article does not maintain sufficiently high scientific standards, it may be rejected at this point. In all cases, the ultimate decision lies with the Editor-in-Chief after a full board consultation.
The views expressed in INVENSI: Jurnal Penciptaan Dan Pengkajian Seni's articles published are the sole responsibility of the authors and are not necessarily shared by the INVENSI: Jurnal Penciptaan Dan Pengkajian Seni editors or the Graduate School of Indonesia Institute of the Arts Yogyakarta.




Publication Frequency

Published twice a year, in June and December.


Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global knowledge exchange.





This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...



Publication Ethics

Our ethic statements are based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.

Hasil gambar untuk committee on publication ethics logo

Publication decisions
The editor is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published.
The editor may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editor may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

Fair play
An editor at any time evaluates manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.

The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.

Duties of Reviewers

Contribution to Editorial Decisions
Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.

Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.

Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.

Standards of Objectivity
Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Acknowledgement of Sources
Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest
Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

Duties of Authors

Reporting standards
Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.

Originality and Plagiarism
The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.

Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication
An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.

Acknowledgement of Sources
Proper acknowledgement of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

Authorship of the Paper
Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors.

The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included in the paper and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest
All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or another substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.

Fundamental errors in published works
When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.




Plagiarism Check

Authors should only submit original work that hasn't been published or isn't currently being considered elsewhere. The editorial team will check submitted manuscripts against previously published works using Turnitin or another plagiarism detection tool. In the first step, a Turnitin program will be used to check each submitted manuscript for degrees of plagiarism. 25% is the upper limit for all detected sources combined, while 3% is the upper limit for each source. If the manuscript passes Turnitin, the next step is to check with additional programs and search engines to prevent plagiarism software from being cheated.