http://journal.isi.ac.id/index.php/invensi

Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Jurnal INVENSI memuat semua tulisan/artikel yang berobjek materi seni, baik seni pertunjukan, seni rupa, maupun seni media rekam dan bersifat multidimensional. INVENSI bermaksud untuk memberikan ruang mewadahi berbagai macam ide, gagasan, atau kritik yang merupakan hasil penelitian empiris kuantitatif dan kualitatif terkait dengan seni pertunjukan, seni rupa, dan seni media rekam yang belum pernah diterbitkan dalam bentuk apapun.

 

INVENSI contains all writings/articles with the object of art material, both performing arts, fine arts and recording media art and are multidimensional in nature. INVENSI intends to provide a space to accommodate various kinds of ideas, ideas, or criticisms which are the results of quantitative and qualitative empirical research related to performing arts, visual arts, and recording media art that has never been published in any form.

 

 

 

Section Policies

Articles

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

INVENSI

Jurnal INVENSI memuat semua tulisan yang berobjek materi seni, baik seni pertunjukan, seni rupa, maupun seni media rekam dan bersifat multidimensional. INVENSI bermaksud untuk memberikan ruang mewadahi berbagai macam ide, gagasan, atau kritik yang merupakan hasil penelitian empiris kuantitatif dan kualitatif terkait dengan seni pertunjukan, seni rupa, dan seni media rekam yang belum pernah diterbitkan dalam bentuk apapun.

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

Semua naskah ditelaah secara blind review oleh mitra bestari yang ditunjuk penyunting menurut bidang kepakarannya. Penulis artikel diberi kesempatan melakukan perbaikan naskah atas dasar saran/rekomendasi dari mitra bestari dan atau penyunting.

 
According to their field of expertise, all manuscripts are reviewed in a blind review by a review partner appointed by the editor. Article writers are given the opportunity to make improvements to the manuscript on the basis of suggestions/recommendations from reviewers and or editors.

 

Publication Frequency

Terbit dua kali setahun, bulan Juni dan bulan Desember.

Published twice a year, in June and December.

 

Open Access Policy

Jurnal ini menyediakan akses terbuka langsung ke kontennya dengan prinsip bahwa membuat penelitian tersedia secara bebas untuk publik mendukung pertukaran pengetahuan global yang lebih besar.

 

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

 

 

 

Archiving

Jurnal ini menggunakan sistem LOCKSS untuk membuat sistem pengarsipan terdistribusi di antara perpustakaan yang berpartisipasi dan memungkinkan perpustakaan tersebut untuk membuat arsip permanen jurnal untuk tujuan pelestarian dan restorasi. Selengkapnya... 


This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...

 

 

Publication Ethics

Our ethic statements are based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.

Hasil gambar untuk committee on publication ethics logo

Publication decisions
The editor is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published.
The editor may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editor may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

Fair play
An editor at any time evaluates manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.

Confidentiality
The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.

Duties of Reviewers

Contribution to Editorial Decisions
Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.

Promptness
Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.

Confidentiality
Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.

Standards of Objectivity
Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Acknowledgement of Sources
Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest
Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

Duties of Authors

Reporting standards
Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.

Originality and Plagiarism
The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.

Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication
An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.

Acknowledgement of Sources
Proper acknowledgement of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

Authorship of the Paper
Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors.

The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included in the paper and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest
All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or another substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.

Fundamental errors in published works
When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.

 

 

 

Plagiarism Check

Semua naskah yang dikirimkan ke INVENSI-Jurnal Penciptaan dan Pengkajian Seni harus bebas dari tindakan plagiarisme. Semua penulis disarankan untuk menggunakan software pendeteksi plagiarisme untuk melakukan pengecekan kemiripan artikel. Editor memeriksa deteksi plagiarisme artikel di jurnal ini dengan menggunakan perangkat lunak Turnitin.

 

All manuscripts submitted to INVENSI-Jurnal Penciptaan dan Pengkajian Seni must be free from acts of plagiarism. All authors are advised to use plagiarism detection software to check the similarity of articles. The editor checks for plagiarism detection of articles in this journal using the Turnitin software.