Art as the Manifestation of Embodiment in the Age of Modern technology

Ferdinand Indrajaya

Abstract


It is undeniable that modern technology has been penetrating our contemporary life in
myriad aspects. From the water we drink, foods we eat, to the installed applications in
our phone. Hence modern technology has become one dominating worldview on its
own which skips our reflection upon it. Its rapid growth stems from the dismissal of
tradition and simultaneously with the tremendous scientific discoveries with its inherent
instrumental rationality. It actively participates in serving the irrational dimension of
our cybernetics-contemporary life. Thus it is not a neutral ensemble of devices, but
normatively-prescriptive directs our being in achieving our goals mechanically. As
Heidegger said, it enframes our being in the world in a disembodied fashion. Enframing,
is the quintessence of modern technology. Merleau-Ponty, as another ardent critic, also
stated that modern technology is essentially manipulative. Under the heading of scientism
(and or cybernetics), it anesthetizes humanity as its own manipulandum. Contrasting
with such view, art potentially re-attunes our relation with things. From Merleau-Ponty’s
phenomenological perspective, art (especially painting) powerfully shows the prereflective
and embodied contact with the world. This paper is an attempt to show the role
of
art in a life that has been eclipsed by the modern technological worldview.


Keywords


modern technology, enframing, disembodied, painting

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adorno, Theodor and Max Horkheimer. 1973. Dialectic of Enlightenment, translated

by John Cumming. London: Verso.

Brey, Philip. 2009. “Human Enhancement and Personal Identity.” In New Waves in

Philosophy of Technology, edited by Jan Kyrre Berg Olsen, Evan Selinger, and Søren

Riis, 169-185. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Carman, Taylor. 2008. Merleau-Ponty. London & New York: Routledge.

Copleston, S. J., Frederick. 1958. A History of Philosophy Volume VII – Descartes to

Leibniz. London: Burns Oates & Washbourne Ltd.

Demske, James M. 1970. Being, Man, and Death – A Key to Heidegger. Kentucky:

University Press of Kentucky.

Descartes, Rene. 1911. The Philosophical Works of Rene Descartes – Volume I, translated

by Elizabeth Haldance and G.R.T. Ross. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Heidegger, Martin. 1977. “The Question Concerning Technology.” In The Question

Concerning Technology and Other Essays, translated by William Lovitt. New York:

Garland Publishing, Inc.

Hughes, Thomas P. 2004. Human-built World: How to Think about Technology and

Culture. Chicago, Ill: University of Chicago Press.

Hume, David. 1978. A Treatise of Human Nature, reprinted from the Original Edition

in three volumes and edited, with an analytical index, by L.A. Selby-Bigge, M.A.

Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Lewis, Michael and Tanja Staehler. 2010. Phenomenology – An Introduction. New York:

Continuum International Publishing.

Li-Hua, Richard. 2009. “Definitions of Technology.” In A Companion to the Philosophy

of Technology – A Blackwell Companion to Philosophy, edited by Jan Kyrre Berg

Olsen, Stig Andur Pedersen, and Vincent F. Hendricks, 18-22. New Jersey:

Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Matthews, Eric. 2006. Merleau-Ponty – A Guide for the Perplexed. New York:

Continuum International Publishing.

Mazis, Glen A. 2016. Merleau-Ponty and the Face of the World – Silence, Ethics,

Imagination, and Poetic Ontology. New York: SUNY Press.

McLuhan, Marshall and Quentin Fiore. 2001. The Medium is the Massage – An

Inventory of Effects. California: Gingko Press Inc.

Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 1964. “Eye and Mind”, translated by Carleton Dallery

in The Primacy of Perception – And Other Essays on Phenomenological Psychology,

the Philosophy of Art, History and Politics, edited by John Wild, 159-190. Illinois:

Northwestern University Press.

Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 1962. Phenomenology of Perception, translated by Colin

Smith. London & New York: Routledge.

Misa, Thomas J. 2009. “History of Technology.” In A Companion to the Philosophy of

Technology – A Blackwell Companion to Philosophy, edited by Jan Kyrre Berg Olsen,

Stig Andur Pedersen, and Vincent F. Hendricks, 7-17. New Jersey: Blackwell

Publishing Ltd.

Pickering, Andrew. 2009. “Cybernetics.” In A Companion to the Philosophy of

Technology – A Blackwell Companion to Philosophy, edited by Jan Kyrre Berg Olsen,

Stig Andur Pedersen, and Vincent F. Hendricks, 118-122. New Jersey: Blackwell

Publishing Ltd, 2009.

Sabatino, Charles J. 2007. “A Heideggerian Reflection on the Prospects of

Technology,” Janus Head 10(1): 64-76.

Tabachnick, David E. 2013. The Great Reversal – How We Let Technology Take Control of

the Planet. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

Verene, Donald P. 2004. “Persons in a Technological Universe.” In Globalization,

Technology, and Philosophy, edited by David Tabachnick and Toivo Koivukoski,

-242. New York: State University of New York Press.

Wrathall, Mark. 2011. “The Phenomenological Relevance of Art”. In Art and

Phenomenology, edited by Joesph D. Parry. New York: Routledge.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24821/ijcas.v5i1.2209

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 423 times
PDF - 462 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Visitors