Thesis Writing Model of Art Practice

Indro Moerdisuroso, Zaitun Y.A. Kherid

Abstract


ABSTRACT

The result of this study is contributed to improving the academic thinking of art practice students, especially in the writing of the undergraduate thesis. The problem is about a system of academic thinking as reflected in the thesis guidebook. Students' academic thinking in thesis writing is guided by a manual book published by a local institution. The case in this study is the thesis guidebook of art practice in an art study program. In this book has no explicit explanation on method and analysis aspects. Whereas both of these aspects are precisely the essence of academic thinking, that is research-based thinking. This fact encourages a study of thesis writing model of art practice, particularly on methods and analysis aspects. This study implements a Research and Development (R&D) approach and mixed methods. The model will propose Teikmanis' typology of art-related research, such as practice-led research, research-led practice, and artistic research. It also adapted Barrett's structure of art education, which consisted of conceptual, operational and synthesis aspects. The conclusion of the study showed that the participants were able to arrange a thesis based on this model.

 

Model Penulisan Tesis Praktik Seni

ABSTRAK

Hasil penelitian ini dikontribusikan untuk meningkatkan pemikiran akademik mahasiswa praktik seni, khususnya dalam penulisan skripsi. Masalahnya adalah tentang berpikir akademis sebagaimana tercermin dalam pedoman skripsi. Pemikiran akademis dalam penulisan skripsi dipandu oleh pedoman penulisan yang diterbitkan oleh institusi terkait. Kasus dalam penelitian ini adalah suatu pedoman skripsi praktik seni dalam suatu program studi seni rupa. Dalam buku ini tidak ada penjelasan eksplisit tentang aspek metode dan analisis. Padahal kedua aspek ini justru merupakan inti dari pemikiran akademis, yaitu pemikiran berbasis penelitian. Fakta ini mendorong studi model penulisan skripsi praktik seni, terutama dalam aspek metode dan analisis. Studi ini menerapkan pendekatan Penelitian dan Pengembangan (R&D) dengan metode campuran. Model ini mengusulkan tipologi penelitian seni Teikmanis, seperti practiceled research, research-led practice, dan artistic research. Selain itu juga mengadaptasi struktur pendidikan seni Barrett, yang terdiri dari aspek konseptual, operasional, dan sintesis. Kesimpulan dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa para partisipan dapat menyusun skripsi berdasarkan model ini.


Keywords


thesis writing, art practice, analysis, guidebook | penulisan skripsi, praktik seni, analisis, buku pedoman

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adisukma, Wisnu., Achmad Sjafi’i, Sunarmi, et al. (2015). “Panduan Tugas Akhir Seni Rupa dan Desain”. Institut Seni Indonesia Surakarta, Indonesia.

Anderson, Lorin W., David R. Krathwohl, Peter W. Airasian, Kathleen A. Cruikshank, Richard E. Mayer, Paul R. Pintrich, James Raths, Merlin C. Wittrock (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. A Bridge Edition. United States: Addison Wesley Longman. ISBN 0-8013-1903-X

Arlander, Annette. (2017). Artistic Research for Speculative Practice. Journal for Artistic Research. ISSN 2235-0225. Accessed on 16 May 2020 from https://doi.org/10.22501/jarnet.0001

Askarzai, Walied., Bhuvan Unhelkasr. (2017). Research Methodologies: An Extensive Overviews. IJSRM International Journal of Science and Research Methodologies Vol. 6, Issue 4, June 2017. http://ijsrm.humanjournals.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/3.Dr_.-Walied-ASKARZAI-Bhuvan-Unhelkar.pdf

Barrett, Maurice. (1982). Art Education, Strategy for Course Design. London: Heinemann Educational Books.

Borgdorff, Henk. (2013). “A brief survey of current debates on the concepts and practices of research in the arts”. In Mick Wilson and Schelte van Ruiten (eds.) Handbook for Artistic Research Education. SHARE, Step-Change for Higher Arts Research and Education. Amsterdam: Elia. ISBN 978-90810357-0-5. Retrieved on May 2017 from http://www.sharenetwork.eu/resources/share-handbook

Borgdorff, Henk. (2016). Buku Pedoman Penulisan Skripsi. Malang: Fakultas Ilmu Budaya, Universitas Brawijaya.

Butt, Danny. (2017). Artistic Research in the Future Academy. Bristol, UK: Intellect Books.

Earnshaw, Rae. (2016). Research and Development in Art, Design, and Creativity. UK: Springer. DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-33005-1

Fryling, Christopher. (1993). “Research in art and design”. Royal College of Art Research Paper Vol. 1. No. 1. 1993/4. London: Royal College of Art. ISBN 1 874175 55 1. Retrieved on 25 July 2019 from http://researchonline.rca.ac.uk/384/3/frayling_research_in_art_and_design_1993.pdf

Gray, Carole, Julian Malins. (2016). Visualizing Research: A Guide to the Research Process of Art and Design. New York, USA: Routledge.

Klein, Julian. (2017). What is artistic research? Journal for Artistic Research. ISSN 2235-0225. Accessed on 13 August 2019 from https://doi.org/10.22501/jarnet.0004

Mäki, Teemu. (2014). Art and Research Colliding. Journal for Artistic Research. ISSN 2235-0225. (2014) Accessed on 16 May 2020 from https://www.researchcatalogue.net/view/49919/49920/0/0

Mateus-Berr, Ruth. (2013). “Habits’ within arts and design-based research”. In Mick Wilson and Schelte van Ruiten (eds.) Handbook for Artistic Research Education. SHARE, Step-Change for Higher Arts Research and Education. Amsterdam: Elia. ISBN 978-90-810357-0-5. Retrieved on July 2019 from http://www.sharenetwork.eu/resources/share-handbook

Merriam Webster Dictionary. Accessed on 16 August 2019 from https://www.merriamwebster.com/dictionary/research.

OECD (2015). “Concepts and definitions for identifying R&D”, in Frascati Manuao 2015: Guidelines for Collecting and Reporting Data on Research and Experimental Development. Paris: OECD Publishing. Retrieved on 25 July 2019 from http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264239012-4-en

Oxford English Dictionary. Accessed from https://www.lexico.com/en/definition/research on 16 August 2019.

_______. (2019). Pedoman Pembimbingan Tugas Akhir Program Studi S-1 Seni Rupa Murni. Yogyakarta: Fakultas Seni Rupa, Institut Seni Indonesia.

Sullivan, Graeme. (2004). Studio art as a research practice. In Elliot W. Eisner and Michael D. Day (eds.) Handbook of Research and Policy in Art Education. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.

Teikmanis, Andris. (2013). Typology of research. In Mick Wilson and Schelte van Ruiten (eds.) Handbook for Artistic Research Education. SHARE, Step Change for Higher Arts Research and Education. Amsterdam: Elia. ISBN 978-90-810357-0-5. Retrieved on May 2019 from http://www.sharenetwork.eu/resources/share-handbook

Undang-undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 12 Tahun 2012 tentang Pendidikan Tinggi. Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Republik Indonesia, 10 Agustus 2012.

Wilson, Brent G. (1971). Evaluation of Learning in Art Education. In Bloom, B. T. Handbook on Formative and Summative Evaluation of Student Learning. New York, USA: McGraw-Hill Inc.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24821/ijcas.v7i1.4162

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 922 times
PDF - 547 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Visitors