Creativity in Distance Learning: Study Designing Art Furniture Based on Upcycling Concepts

Tri Noviyanto Puji Utomo, JE Sutanto

Abstract


The COVID-19 pandemic has lasted for over two years, revolutionizing offline learning in schools worldwide. Distance learning is one of the strategies employed by Indonesian schools and universities to ensure high-quality learning outcomes. However, apart from the technological issues associated with distance learning, there are challenges in implementing these learning outcomes effectively. Therefore, this study aims to examine how to respond to distance learning results. The study was conducted by Interior Architecture students through interior product design courses, utilizing post-use materials from residential homes or upcycling materials. Distance learning was conducted using a combination of synchronous and asynchronous techniques. The learning outcomes yielded 50 interior product concepts, predominantly based on regenerative design principles. These concepts include technical cycle items that can be assembled or incorporated into do-it-yourself (DIY) activities. The findings of this study have implications for fostering new forms of engagement and creativity by transforming waste materials derived from the production process into new art furniture designs.

 

Kreativitas Pembelajaran Jarak Jauh: Studi Merancang Art Furniture Berdasarkan Konsep Upcycling

Abstrak

Pandemi COVID-19 yang telah berlangsung selama dua tahun lebih telah mengubah tatanan proses belajar mengajar di semua sekolah di seluruh dunia. Salah satu upaya yang dilakukan oleh sekolah/kampus adalah dengan memberlakukan strategi pembelajaran jarak jauh, baik langsung maupun tidak langsung. Strategi tersebut dilakukan demi memastikan tetap tercapainya tujuan pembelajaran dengan kualitas yang tetap optimal meski wabah covid masih melanda. Terlepas dari permasalahan teknis yang muncul terkait pembelajaran jarak jauh, muncul suatu pertanyaan tentang bagaimana dengan implementasi atas hasil pembelajaran yang telah dilaksanakan. Penelitian ini mencoba memberikan gambaran bagaimana merespons hasil pembelajaran jarak jauh yang dilakukan oleh mahasiswa prodi interior arsitektur melalui mata kuliah perancangan produk interior dengan studi berbasis material limbah padat rumah tangga atau material upcycling. Hasil dari pembelajaran perancangan menghasilkan 50 konsep produk interior yang sebagian besar merupakan desain regenerative yang secara khusus mengarah pada technical cycle product dengan dominasi pada jenis artefak art furniture. Implementasi hasil produk merujuk pada aktivitas swakriya atau do-it-yourself (DIY). Selain hasil akhir yang berwujud artefak desain, penelitian ini berimplikasi pada munculnya embrio entrepreneurial dalam bentuk interaksi antaranggota keluarga mahasiswa dalam mengembangkan serta menciptakan item baru melalui penggunaan sisa material limbah rumah tangga lain menjadi produk art furniture baru lainnya.

 



Keywords


art furniture, upcycling, DIY (do it yourself), distance learning | art furniture, upcycling, DIY (do it yourself), pembelajaran jarak jauh

Full Text:

PDF

References


Andrews, D. (2015). The circular economy, design thinking and education for sustainability. Local Economy: The Journal of the Local Economy Policy Unit, 30(3), 305–315. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0269094215578226

Annita, A., & Susanto, Y. B. (2021). Effectivity of Asynchronous Learning on Theoretical Compared to Theoretical-Practical Courses at Film Department Universitas Multimedia Nusantara. International Journal of Creative and Arts Studies, 8(2), 123–131. https://doi.org/10.24821/ijcas.v8i2.6305

Baik, E., & Kim, J.-H. (2014). A study on the trend analysis of upcycling furniture design. Journal of the Korea Furniture Society, 25(2), 112–121. https://koreascience.kr/article/JAKO201414937714821.page

Bakker, C. A., Wever, R., Teoh, &, & Clercq, D. (2010). Designing cradle-to-cradle products: A reality check. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, 3(1), 2–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/19397030903395166

Barab, S. a, Evans, M. a, & Baek, E. (2004). Activity theory as a lens for characterizing the participatory the unit. Handbook of Research for Educational Communications and Technology, 199–214.

Braungart, M. (2013). Waste to energy. Catalystreview. http://catalystreview.net/2010/02/cradle to cradle-transitioning-from-waste incineration-to-beneficial-materials

Cohen, B. (1998). Design for reuse. In VHDL Answers to Frequently Asked Questions (pp. 313–339). Springer. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5641-1_10

Gerber, E., McKenna, A., Hirsch, P., & Yarnoff, C. (2010). Learning to waste and wasting to learn? How to use cradle to cradle principles to improve the teaching of design. International Journal of Engineering Education, 26(2), 314–323. https://asu.pure.elsevier.com/en/publications/learning-to-waste-and-wasting-to-learn-how-to-use-cradle-to-cradl

https-::www. (n.d.).

Indonesia, U. (n.d.). Pembelajaran Jarak Jauh UI,. https://pjj.ui.ac.id/

Indrawan, S. E., Purwoko, G. H., & P. Utomo, T. N. (2019). Reparameterizing Tectonics Perception on Planar Material-Design. International Journal of Creative and Arts Studies, 6(1), 69–77. https://doi.org/10.24821/ijcas.v6i1.3276

Kemendikbudristekdikti. (2020). Surat Edaran Kemendikbud No.4 Tahun 2020. https://lldikti8.ristekdikti.go.id

Kopnina, H. (2011). Consumption in environmental education: Developing curriculum that addresses Cradle to Cradle principles. Journal of Peace Education and Social Justice, 5(3), 362–373.

Kopnina, H. (2018). Circular economy and Cradle to Cradle in educational practice. Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences, 15(1), 123–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/1943815x.2018.1471724

Kopnina, H., & Blewitt, J. (2018). Sustainable business: Key issues, 2nd edition. Routledge.

Luis, F., & Moncayo, G. (n.d.). No 主観的健康感を中心とした在宅高齢者における 健康関連指標に関する共分散構造分析Title.

McDonough, W., & Braungart, M. (2002). Cradle to cradle: Remaking the way we make things. North Point Press. https://mcdonough.com/writings/cradle-cradle-remaking-way-make-things/

McDonough, W., & Braungart, M. (2010). Cradle to cradle: Remaking the way we make things. Farrar, Straus and Giroux. https://mcdonough.com/writings/cradle-cradle-remaking-way-make-things/

Murray, A., Skene, K., & Haynes, K. (2017). The circular economy: An Interdisciplinary Exploration of the Concept and Application in a Global Context. Journal of Business Ethics, 140(3), 369–380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2693-2

Page, P. (n.d.). VoSoES TlfE tN.

Sung, K. (2017). Sustainable Production and Consumption by Upcycling: Understanding and Scaling-up Niche Environmentally Significant Behaviour. PQDT - Global, May, 284.

Utomo, T. N. P., Kusumarini, Y., & S, S. E. (2021). Eksplorasi kreativitas desain melalui konsep upcycle material produk furnitur paska pakai. Productum: Jurnal Desain Produk (Pengetahuan Dan Perancangan Produk), 4(1), 59–66. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24821/productum.v4i1.4106

Utomo, T. N. P., Risanti, R., & Parasanti, Q. (2021). “ Co-Help ” sebagai Manifestasi Praktik Sosial Desain dalam Pembelajaran Perancangan Produk Interior selama Pandemi. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Desain Sosial Dengan Tema “Adaptabilitas Desain Sosial: Strategi Inovasi Di Masa Pandemik,” 333–342. https://ojs.uph.edu/index.php/SNDS/article/view/41

Watson, M., & Shove, E. (2005). Doing it yourself ? Products , competence and meaning in the practices of DIY. Social Research. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228577088_Doing_it_yourself_Products_competence_and_meaning_in_the_practices_of_DIY

Xu, J., & Gu, P. (2015). Five Principles of Waste Product Redesign under the Upcycling Concept. April 2013, 1238–1243. https://doi.org/10.2991/ifeesm-15.2015.227




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24821/ijcas.v10i1.7145

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times
PDF - 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Visitors